Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: Please vote for a new Informix RFE:

Posted By: Art Kagel
Date: Friday, 29 July 2016, at 9:38 a.m.

Agree to disagree ... works for me ;-)

Small block size: I ABSOLUTELY agree. However, that goes to my comment
about not having control over the storage configuration. Less and less as
the years progress. Storage guys LOVE block sizes from 1MB to 256MB while
Informix (and most other databases I'm sure) work best with block sizes
between 16K and 256K with my personal sweet spot at 32K. SIGH! Nothing to
be done but keep fighting the good fight. It's on my list right along side
RAID5 and disks larger than 1TB.

Art

Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
ASK Database Management
www.askdbmgt.com

Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am
associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Fernando Nunes <domusonline@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As I wrote, I disagree, so we'll agree on disagreeing. R&D will decide.
> Currently on a really busy system we have many threads waiting on a flush
> (in a worse case scenario). Some of these threads are not doing COMMITS.
> They just need a buffer to write to.
> Overall group commit will benefit, because only threads doing COMMIT would
> wait. It's impossible to tell, but I doubt (it would depend on the
> implementation) that these waits would be worse than the constant wait we
> may have today.
> Having more buffers would in practice turn to a system where no buffer
> would be needed... Just a mutex/latch on the log buffer file descriptor and
> each thread would acquire it. Because the flush has to be done
> sequentially, so it would be similar in the end.
>
> As for what we have today... We can setup each session for buffered...
> this increases the risk, but an application can decide and less critical
> activities could be done in buffered while the default is unbuffered.
>
> I'm not a sotrage expert but having the logical log buffers in a
> filesystem with a very small block size could help.... not sure
>
> Regards
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Fernando:
>>
>> I disagree. I do not think that group commits are the right 'fix' for
>> having all three logical log buffers dirty at the same time. You say that
>> delaying the log buffer flush until more data is in them would not delay
>> transactions, but that is exactly what it will do. Yes the delay will
>> likely be small, but it will be significant on a busy site. Indeed it would
>> just be formalizing the current problem which is transactions that have to
>> wait for the oldest dirty buffer to finish flushing. Same delay. I don't
>> think that the Paddy Power's of the world could or would take advantage of
>> group commits.
>>
>> I agree that the buffers are not the problem and that more of them is not
>> the best solution. Faster flushes is. But we are stuck having to support
>> systems that are configured by "storage experts" and storage vendors who
>> have no clue about the IO requirements of databases. We have to live with
>> what we are given. Increasing the number of log buffers will go a long way
>> to do that.
>>
>> This will introduce some slight added data risk but far less than
>> buffered logging. But, as you say, the volume of data in each log buffer is
>> normally small due to the frequent commits, so the risk is small.
>>
>> Art
>>
>>
>> Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
>> ASK Database Management
>> www.askdbmgt.com
>>
>> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
>> and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am
>> associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
>> those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
>> entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Fernando Nunes <domusonline@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Art,
>>>
>>> I understand the rational behind this request, but I don't think that is
>>> the best way to solve it.
>>> First, we need to distinguish between the logical log buffers (3) and
>>> the hdr logical log buffers (12).
>>> There are situations where we could use "more" of them. For standard
>>> servers the HDR buffers are not an issue. If you see "G" flags in onstat -u
>>> you'll know that we're not flushing the buffers quick enough and it may be
>>> the reason behind this request. On HDR clusters there were situations where
>>> due to network constraints or lack of resources on the secondary the 12
>>> buffers are not enough (in the past there was even a patch provided for a
>>> specific customer if I recall correctly).
>>> Increasing or auto-configuring the HDR buffers would be a good idea.
>>>
>>> However, for the "normal" log buffers (3 of them) increasing them is
>>> like hiding the real problem. The problem with log buffers is that we don't
>>> really use them in real/heavy OLTP systems. As I explained in a recent
>>> thread due to the fact that most customers use non-buffered logging we're
>>> constantly flushing the buffers because we do it on every session COMMIT.
>>>
>>> What should be done and is already implemented in other RDBMS like DB2
>>> and Oracle (SQL server seems to lag behind as they recently introduced what
>>> we have) is what is called "GROUP COMMIT".
>>> Basically we don't flush immediately (to allow the buffer to fill up a
>>> little more at least) but we only return on the COMMIT once the info is
>>> actually flushed to disk.
>>> If done properly the applications will not notice any significant delay,
>>> and instead of doing constant flushes that include around one page of
>>> logical log buffer we do less flushes and that allows for the normal
>>> rotation of the three buffers.
>>>
>>> Last time I don't think I posted this, so, from a real customer:
>>>
>>>
>>> IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.50.FC7XH -- On-Line (Prim) --
>>> Up 365 days 13:22:06 -- 18026336 Kbytes
>>>
>>> Physical Logging
>>> Buffer bufused bufsize numpages numwrits pages/io
>>> P-1 82 128 10621588 85983 123.53
>>> phybegin physize phypos phyused %used
>>> 2:53 1975000 1939119 7499 0.38
>>>
>>> Logical Logging
>>> Buffer bufused bufsize numrecs numpages numwrits recs/pages
>>> pages/io
>>> L-1 0 128 175401685 11939562 6501187 14.7 1.8
>>> Subsystem numrecs Log Space used
>>> OLDRSAM 175401555 16032723948
>>> HA 130 5720
>>>
>>> As you can see we have 256KB of logical log buffer. But on average we
>>> write to disk only 1.8 pages.
>>> This is caused by the fact they use unbuffered logging (like virtually
>>> all the customers) and because they have a relatively large number of
>>> sessions (should vary between 1000 and 3000). So the rate of COMMITS is
>>> very high.
>>>
>>> Of course we coudl increase the number of log buffers... but that's not
>>> how this problem was solved in other technologies and there are probably
>>> good reasons for that.
>>>
>>> Finally, there is also an RFE to implement GROUP COMMITS:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=45166
>>>
>>> Feel free to vote ;)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks:
>>>>
>>>> I have entered a new RFE # 92334. It requests that IBM make the number
>>>> of logical log buffers configurable, dynamically adjustable, and include an
>>>> AUTO_ autonomic tuning capability for this resource:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=92334
>>>>
>>>> Please vote for this if you think it might be useful to you.
>>>>
>>>> Art
>>>>
>>>> Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
>>>> ASK Database Management
>>>> www.askdbmgt.com
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
>>>> opinions and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with
>>>> which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference.
>>>> Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated
>>>> with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
>>>> themselves.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Informix-list mailing list
>>>> Informix-list@iiug.org
>>>> http://members.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fernando Nunes
>>> Portugal
>>>
>>> http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
>>> My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Nunes
> Portugal
>
> http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
> My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
>

--001a1143f0a6d6f9420538c65b62

[ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.