IDS Forum

RE: sugessiong regarding chunks

Posted By:
Date:

Nagarjuna

No, there is no need to add chinks to these (unless you need to create any
more logical logs). The physdbs (I assume from the name) holds the physical
log which is fixed in size (in the onconfig file) and will not vary (unless
you change the onconfig). The lldbs (again assuming from the name) holds the
logical log files which again will not vary (unless you need to create more
logical logs).
If you have a history of onstat -d output (useful to see how quickly and by
how much free space is disappearing) you will see the free space in these
spaces do not vary.

Keith

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Nagarjuna K.... [mailto:nagarjuna.kurra@gujaratgas.com]
-> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:25 AM
-> To: ids@iiug.org
-> Subject: sugessiong regarding chunks [457]
->
->
-> hi all,
->
-> By observing the onstat -d output , it shows less than 2
-> % of lldbs and
-> phydbs are free.i Have set my LTAPEDEV to /dev/null
-> but still it shows the same .
->
-> do i need to add extra chunks to lldbs and phydbs
-> Dbspaces
-> address number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
-> d2d04158 1 1001 1 1 N
-> informix rootdbs
-> d2d056f8 2 1 2 1 N
-> informix physdbs
-> d2d057b8 3 1 3 1 N informix logdbs
-> d2d05878 4 1 4 4 N informix dbs1
-> d2d05938 5 1 5 3 N informix dbs2
-> d2d059f8 6 1 6 6 N informix dbs3
-> d2d05ab8 7 2001 7 1 N T
-> informix tempdbs
-> 7 active, 2047 maximum
->
-> Chunks
-> address chk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathname
-> d2d04218 1 1 0 50000 47535 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/rootdbs
-> d2d048f8 2 2 0 50000 947 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/physdbs
-> d2d049d8 3 3 0 76000 947 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/lldbs
-> d2d04ab8 4 4 0 1048000 15222 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs1
-> d2d04b98 5 5 0 980000 178 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs2
-> d2d04c78 6 6 0 920000 127 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs3
-> d2d04d58 7 7 0 250000 249455 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/tempdbs
-> d2d04e38 8 4 0 350000 3670 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_123
-> d2d04f18 9 5 350000 350000 731 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_123
-> d2d04ff8 10 6 700000 340000 68 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_123
-> d2d050d8 11 6 0 275000 525 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs3_c2
-> d2d051b8 12 4 0 250000 52628 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_234
-> d2d05298 13 5 250000 500000 435984 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_234
-> d2d05378 14 6 750000 250000 44805 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/chunk_234
-> d2d05458 15 4 0 500000 499997 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs1_170103
-> d2d05538 16 6 0 50000 49997 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs3_170103
-> d2d05618 17 6 50000 450000 449997 PO-
-> /dev/ifmx/dbs3_170103
-> 17 active, 2047 maximum
->
-> with regards
->
-> Nagarjuna.K
->
->
->
->

**********************************************************************************
This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only. It may
contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed
to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested
to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any
error in transmission.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message
is free from such problems.
**********************************************************************************

Messages In This Thread

• sugessiong regarding chunks
  Nagarjuna Kurra -- Friday, 21 February 2003, at 4:25 a.m.
  • AW: sugessiong regarding chunks
    Mueller Thomas -- Friday, 21 February 2003, at 4:52 a.m.
    • Fwd: Re: Informix Object Translator
      ART KAGEL, BLOOMBERG/ 65E 55TH -- Monday, 9 June 2003, at 9:07 a.m.
  • RE: sugessiong regarding chunks
    Simmons, Keith -- Friday, 21 February 2003, at 5:57 a.m.

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.