Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: Table Fragmentation

Posted By: FRANK
Date: Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 2:30 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Table Fragmentation (FRANK)

Joe,

8 million rows is not a big deal. No challenge at all.

I think People prefer new challenges, that may be the reason why the table
with 8 million partitions got born.
Luckily, we can handle it well!

Frank

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, FRANK <yunyaoqu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Joe,
>
> Very sure!
>
> We have 8 million partitions, NOT 8 million rows. Again 8 million
> PARTITIONS!!
>
> We have 256 rows in the table.
>
> Actually, the performance is getting better now....
> It only takes less than 2 seconds to do all types of fragmentation
> operations... no locks need.
> Fast enough?
>
> Frank
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Plugge, Joe R. <JRPlugge@west.com> wrote:
>
> > So, let me understand you here, you have a total of 256 rows, inserted
> into
> > a
> > table with 8 million partitions? You sure you don't mean that you have 8
> > million rows in a table with 256 partitions?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of
> > FRANK
> > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 12:06 PM
> > To: ids@iiug.org
> > Subject: Re: Table Fragmentation [19220]
> >
> > Plugge, Joe R,
> >
> > We have a table that has 8 million partitions ( lot more than you have !)
> > and it has no more than 256 rows in life time. It only takes 3 seconds to
> > do all types of fragment manipulations.
> >
> > Do you want to know how we did it?
> >
> > Franks
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Plugge, Joe R. <JRPlugge@west.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > We have this table that even when totally empty, it chews through tons
> of
> > > locks on the detach:
> > >
> > > CREATE RAW TABLE monitor_min_sum (
> > >
> > > client INTEGER NOT NULL,
> > >
> > > program INTEGER NOT NULL,
> > >
> > > site VARCHAR(25,0),
> > >
> > > phone CHAR(10) NOT NULL,
> > >
> > > calldate DATETIME YEAR TO MINUTE NOT NULL,
> > >
> > > calls INTEGER NOT NULL
> > > )
> > > FRAGMENT BY EXPRESSION
> > >
> > > PARTITION p201003050700 ((calldate >= datetime(2010-03-05 07:00) year
> to
> > > minute ) AND (calldate <= datetime(2010-03-05 07:59) year to minute ) )
> > IN
> > > dbs3,
> > >
> > > PARTITION p201003050600 ((calldate >= datetime(2010-03-05 06:00) year
> to
> > > minute ) AND (calldate <= datetime(2010-03-05 06:59) year to minute ) )
> > IN
> > > dbs3,
> > >
> > > PARTITION p201003050500 ((calldate >= datetime(2010-03-05 05:00) year
> to
> > > minute ) AND (calldate <= datetime(2010-03-05 05:59) year to minute ) )
> > IN
> > > dbs3,
> > >
> > > PARTITION p201003050400 ((calldate >= datetime(2010-03-05 04:00) year
> to
> > > minute ) AND (calldate <= datetime(2010-03-05 04:59) year to minute ) )
> > IN
> > > dbs3 .......
> > >
> > > ..... about 800 PARTITIONS ...
> > >
> > > EXTENT SIZE 64 NEXT SIZE 64 LOCK MODE ROW;
> > >
> > > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX uix_monitor_min_sum ON monitor_min_sum (
> > >
> > > client ASC,
> > >
> > > program ASC,
> > >
> > > site ASC,
> > >
> > > phone ASC,
> > >
> > > calldate ASC
> > > ) USING btree;
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of
> > Kern
> > > Doe
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 3:07 PM
> > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > Subject: Re: Table Fragmentation [19197]
> > >
> > > As always, this is a very informative explanation I should take notes
> > too.
> > > Thanks Art.
> > > Emiliano, re-strategize your partition now, think ahead for the last
> > > partition
> > > scheme "partpositionnew". I assume you will also partition by month
> same
> > > way
> > > as the old ones.
> > >
> > > For any reason where you still want to try timing your detach process
> > with
> > > the
> > > old partition scheme, try to turn pdq on, it should speed up a little
> > bit.
> > >
> > > set pdppriority 50;
> > > alter fragment ...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com>
> > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 2:25:50 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Table Fragmentation [19189]
> > >
> > > Emiliano,
> > >
> > > Detaching a fragment should generally be very fast, as others have
> > > indicated. However, if you have a non-fragmented index or an index that
> > is
> > > fragmented on a different strategy, then detaching the fragment will
> > cause
> > > the entire index to have to be rebuilt from scratch (which is faster
> than
> > > if
> > > the engine just went through and deleted all of the keys you are about
> to
> > > detach). That operation is likely what's slowing you down.
> > >
> > > Art
> > >
> > > Art S. Kagel
> > > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > > IIUG Board of Directors (art@iiug.org)
> > >
> > > See you at the 2010 IIUG Informix Conference
> > > April 25-28, 2010
> > > Overland Park (Kansas City), KS
> > > www.iiug.org/conf
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> opinions
> > > and
> > > do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> > other
> > > organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly,
> or
> > > by
> > > inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals
> > > affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the
> > > entities themselves.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Kern Doe <kern_doe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Assuming you have your table partitioned properly by month per your
> > > saying,
> > > > correct, it should take seconds (or at least in my experience). I
> think
> > > the
> > > > one hour you encountered was mostly for waiting for an available
> > > exclusive
> > > > lock - which may be hard for an active large table.
> > > > You may want to try timing again on a real test environment and make
> > sure
> > > > there is absolutely no access to that table.
> > > > Kern --
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > > From: Emiliano Romero <eromero@sitrack.com>
> > > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > > Sent: Wed, March 3, 2010 8:53:52 AM
> > > > Subject: Table Fragmentation [19170]
> > > >
> > > > Hi! I have an historic table (5 months) with about 30 millions record
> > > > per month. Our primary problem is that deleting old data takes too
> long
> > > > (we have some indexes in that table). So I start making some tests
> with
> > > > fragmentation.
> > > > I fragment my table with a date expression (monthly), using
> partitions,
> > > > so here are some question I have about fragmentation.
> > > >
> > > > - It takes like 1 hour to detach a 30 million row partition (1
> month).
> > > > Are these normal times? Any idea how can I get better times with that
> > > > amount of data? Everywhere I read people talk about seconds to detach
> a
> > > > partition.
> > > >
> > > > - Attaching and Detaching result in an exclusive lock in my table. Is
> > > > there some way to avoid an exclusive lock?
> > > >
> > > > I use IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.50.FC5
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards
> > > >
> > > > Emiliano Romero
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --001517447dbadfe0450480ea7247
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --000e0cd5cd6a75a1f20480fd74fd
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --00504502ad5f0d395c0480fe70bb
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>

--000e0cd14b189a950f0480fea046

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.