Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: Fw: Optimizer

Posted By: Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com
Date: Thursday, 29 March 2012, at 1:24 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Fw: Optimizer (Art Kagel)

You may be right ... I just updated the stats on all the tables and now I
get the bad plan no matter what ...

Peter Logan
Senior Database Administrator
Phone: 616/878-8309

From: "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com>
To: ids@iiug.org
Date: 03/29/2012 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26606]
Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org

Yeah, I don't think so (on the optimizer executing the function). However,

you note that the query plan changes even when you hardwire different
values for the week id that would be the output of the function, so I'm
still thinking it has something to do with the quality of the data
distributions.

Art

Art S. Kagel
Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated
nor
those of the entities themselves.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <
Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:

> Haven't tried that yet ...
>
> But what I don't understand .. is why the optimizer would pick a
different
> path ... the only difference is the day the query is run .....which
> obviously will change the returned value from the weekid function ... is

> it somehow executing that part of the sql to determine the query plan
....
>
> Peter Logan
> Senior Database Administrator
> Phone: 616/878-8309
>
> From: "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com>
> To: ids@iiug.org
> Date: 03/29/2012 11:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26604]
> Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
>
> Don't know the reporting tool you are using, but couldn't you just
include
>
> the statement in the stream of SQL statements? LIke:
>
> "set optimization low; <big query>; set optimization high;"
>
> Also, are you completely certain that the data distributions on the two
> tables that are being directly affected by the week id (so
> week_to_year_lkp
> and efin_wk_line_cls) are current and sufficiently detailed? Have you
> tried increasing the resolution for the HIGH on the
> week_to_year_lkp.fiscal_week_id, efin_wk_line_cls.fiscal_week_id, and
> week_to_year_lkp.fiscal_wty_id columns beyond the default 2.5%?
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel
> Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions

> and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any

> other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
> other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated
> nor
> those of the entities themselves.
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <
> Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:
>
> > I understand ... but from what I understand the client tool can only
set
>
> > this at the beginning ....
> >
> > Peter Logan
> > Senior Database Administrator
> > Phone: 616/878-8309
> >
> > From: "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com>
> > To: ids@iiug.org
> > Date: 03/29/2012 10:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26602]
> > Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
> >
> > No, you can switch between OPTIMIZATION LOW; and OPTIMIZATION HIGH;
> > between
> > queries. It would be nice if they would just add these are optimizer
> > directives though, like ALL_ROWS and FIRST_ROWS optimizer goals.
> >
> > That's a hint Fernando!
> >
> > Art
> >
> > Art S. Kagel
> > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
opinions
>
> > and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor
any
>
> > other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> > implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those
of
> > other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am
affiliated
> > nor
> > those of the entities themselves.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <
> > Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Art,
> > >
> > > yes .. and that does help this particular query ... the issue though

> is
> > > that this is only one part of a larger set of queries...and the
> > > optimization being set low has a negative impact on the entire
stream
> > ....
> > > and they can't turn that off and back on .... can only set it for
the
> > > session ...
> > >
> > > Peter Logan
> > > Senior Database Administrator
> > > Phone: 616/878-8309
> > >
> > > From: "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com>
> > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > Date: 03/29/2012 10:24 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26600]
> > > Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
> > >
> > > One thing Peter, have you tried running this query under SET
> > OPTIMIZATION
> > > LOW? You have 10 tables in there, I'm willing to bet that a
> significant
> > > portion of the runtime is optimizing the query since there are
> 3,628,800
> >
> > > query plans that have to be examined and have cost calculated under
> the
> > > default HIGH optimization method versus only 54 query plans under
LOW
> > > optimization.
> > >
> > > Art
> > >
> > > Art S. Kagel
> > > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> opinions
> >
> > > and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor

> any
> >
> > > other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> > > implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those

> of
> > > other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am
> affiliated
> > > nor
> > > those of the entities themselves.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <
> > > Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok .. here is the really strange thing ...
> > > >
> > > > If I do away with the function ... and put in place the fiscal
week
> id
> >
> > > ....
> > > > then up until week 36 one query plan is used ... and then from
week
> 37
> >
> > > on,
> > > > a different query plan is used ... The first plan runs in a
> > minute...the
> > >
> > > > second several minutes ... when I put the directive on the query
and
>
> > > > force it to use the order of the tables that was chosen by the
> > optimizer
> > >
> > > > it always runs in a minute ...
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to see if an external directive will work for this one
..
>
> > > just
> > > > to give them that as a choice .. but I can't seem to get that
> working
> > > ....
> > > > I can save the external directive, but when I execute the sql, the

> > > > explain doesn't show the directive being used ... and I'm using
the
> > > exact
> > > > sql to create the directive as well as execute the sql ...
wondering
>
> > if
> > > > the function in the sql is messing that up ...
> > > >
> > > > Peter Logan
> > > > Senior Database Administrator
> > > > Phone: 616/878-8309
> > > >
> > > > From: "Fernando Nunes" <domusonline@gmail.com>
> > > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > > Date: 03/29/2012 09:52 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26597]
> > > > Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm.... Yes, I think I can understand the point, although tables
> > schema
> > >
> > > > would help.
> > > > I believe the problem is a well known issue (notice I use "issue"
> > > instead
> > > > of "bug"). And recent versions have been seeing changes in that
> area.
> > > >
> > > > Would I be correct to assume the bad query plan is using a
> > date/datetime
> > >
> > > > index? This could be one source of the problem, but in your case
> it's
> > > > probably another issue.
> > > > You're asking the optimizer to calculate a query plan based on the

> > > unknown
> > > >
> > > > result of a user function. As such the optimizer must
> > consider/estimate
> > > a
> > > > selectivity. Too low will make that index non attractive, and too
> high
> >
> > > > makes it too attractive. And the dramatic issue is that it has no
> way
> > to
> > >
> > > > make a good estimate.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that recent versions (11.50.FC9 and maybe 11.70.FC2/3)
may
>
> > > have
> > > > change the way this selectivity is calculated. This solved many
> > > customer's
> > > >
> > > > problems and probably caused problems to many others...
> > > >
> > > > I'm not in developing but I believe 11.70.FC4 may have changed
this.
>
> > And
> > >
> > > > eventually some improvements may appear in the future. Would it be

> too
> >
> > > > hard
> > > > for you to try that query on 11.70.FC4?
> > > >
> > > > Of course, if you had the chance to avoid the use of the function
> and
> > > give
> > > >
> > > > it the value the problem should not happen.
> > > > If you're sure that the query should NEVER use that index (on the
> > column
> > >
> > > > you're comparing with the function result), you can use some sort
of
>
> > > > operation on it. For example:
> > > >
> > > > my_column + 0 UNITS DAY = ( SELECT WEEKID(...) FROM systables
WHERE
> > > tabid
> > > > =
> > > > 0)
> > > >
> > > > This will avoid the use of any index on that column and will not
> > change
> > > > the
> > > > result set... hmmmm... But again, if that's a query generated from
a
>
> > > tool
> > > > this may not be feasible.
> > > >
> > > > P.S.: Above I avoided using the term "bug" because this is a nasty

> > > > situation... We must consider some value for selectivity, but we
> have
> > no
> > >
> > > > idea about the possible or probable result of the function. So
> > basically
> > >
> > > > we're blind... I can't imagine a good solution (that will fit all
> the
> > > > scenarios) for this.
> > > >
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <
> > > > Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the reply ... Yes, the auto stats updating has been
> > > disabled
> > > > > ... and I am aware of the external optimizer directives ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me try to sum this up a little differently ... when the date

> was
> >
> > > say
> > > >
> > > > > 9/15/2011 .... one query plan was followed ... the one that
works
> > ....
> > > > now
> > > > > that the date is 3/28/2012 ... the optimizer is choosing a
> different
> >
> > > > path
> > > > > ... so, what it seems to me is that the optimizer must be
> evaluating
> >
> > > > that
> > > > > part of the query .. and then figuring out the query plan from
> there
> >
> > > ....
> > > > I
> > > > > could understand that if this was a constant, but this isn't ...

> the
> >
> > > > > select weekid(today, -1) from systables where tabid = 1 is a
> > procedure
> > >
> > > > > that brings back the fiscal week id .. ie 201252 ... does that
> make
> > a
> > > > > little ore sense ... I'm trying to figure out if the optimizer
is
> > > making
> > > >
> > > > > that evaluation .. then coming up with the plan.... and if so,
how
>
> > to
> > > > keep
> > > > > it from doing that ....
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter Logan
> > > > > Senior Database Administrator
> > > > > Phone: 616/878-8309
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "Fernando Nunes" <domusonline@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > > > Date: 03/28/2012 05:11 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Fw: Optimizer [26592]
> > > > > Sent by: ids-bounces@iiug.org
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm afraid I didn't understand your point correctly. You mention

> the
> >
> > > > > select
> > > > > from systables but I didn't understand how it's relevant for the

> > > > problem.
> > > > > Are you saying that query presented works fine but if you use
the
> > > select
> > > >
> > > > > from systables instead of:
> > > > >
> > > > > and a12.fiscal_week_id in (201253)
> > > > >
> > > > > It will break the query plan?
> > > > >
> > > > > In any case a few warnings and maybe some useful information:
> > > > >
> > > > > - 11.7 alreay includes the AUTO_STAT_MODE parameter. This
> activates
> > or
> > >
> > > > > deactivates the optimization that says to the engine that "if
the
> > > table
> > > > > doesn't change too much don't bother to update it's statistics".
I
>
> > had
> > > a
> > > >
> > > > > recent situation where the default threshold was causing some
> > stalled
> > > > > statistics and it made a difference on the query plans. And the
> > > > > probability
> > > > > that this happens with queries involving time/dates is higher
than
>
> > > with
> > > > > other types of filters (because these fields many times tend to
be
>
> > > > > populated with constantly increasing values, so statistically
> > > something
> > > > > that makes the filter "column > today - some_time" look good
will
> in
> >
> > > > time
> > > > > lead to bad choices)
> > > > >
> > > > > - You can activate optimizer directives for any query outside
the
> > > > > applications by using the External Directives feature. I will
not
> go
> >
> > > > into
> > > > > details, because it could take a while, but if you're not aware
of
>
> > > this
> > > > > and
> > > > > need further information, please tell. In any case I'm against
the
>
> > > > > principle of using directives to solve query plans problems...
> after
> >
> > > all
> > > >
> > > > > we
> > > > > have an optimizer... we're not Oracle :)
> > > > >
> > > > > So, my advise:
> > > > > - Verify that the distributions are really up to date (disable
> > > > > AUTO_STAT_MODE) and run them (it's dynamic and I believe there's
a
>
> > way
> > >
> > > > to
> > > > > control it inside the session (either with SET ENVIRONMENT or
with
> a
> >
> > > > > environment variable)
> > > > > - If you never used the external optimizer directives, please
> > > > investigate
> > > > > them. Sometimes you can get away with them to quickly solve a
> > > > performance
> > > > > problem. But my advise is to always investigate this kind of
> > problems
> > > > and
> > > > > find a definitive solution
> > > > > - You could of course re-post your problem in a manner I can
> > > understand,
> > > >
> > > > > or
> > > > > wait until someone smarter to answer you :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com <

> > > > > Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Aix 6.1
> > > > > > IDS 11.70.fc3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The below query was executing ok, and then recently it started

> > > taking
> > > > a
> > > > > > lot longer... In looking at the query plans, the order of the
> > tables
> > >
> > > > > > changed a few weeks ago... Amount of data and stats in the
> tables
> > > > > haven't
> > > > > > changed dramatically ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The question I have, is ... Is the optimizer smart enough to
> > execute
> > >
> > > > the
> > > > >
> > > > > > (select weekid(today, -1) from systables where tabid = 1 ... I

> can
> >
> > > > > > duplicate if I take that select out and hard code the fiscal
> week
> > id
> > >
> > > > ...
> > > > > > runs about a minute .. then runs about 4 minutes. The query
plan
>
> > > > changes
> > > > >
> > > > > > ... If I do run the query with the directive ... then I can
> > > > consistently
> > > > >
> > > > > > get it to run around a minute .. The problem is that this is a

> > Micro
> > >
> > > > > > Strategies report, so that optimizer directive can't be
included
>
> > > .....
> > > > > > Any help would be appreciated ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peter Logan
> > > > > > Senior Database Administrator
> > > > > > Phone: 616/878-8309
> > > > > > ----- Forwarded by Peter Logan/Corporate/Spartan on 03/28/2012

> > 03:53
> > >
> > > > PM
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: plisad0 (spartan02) <plisad0@spartanstores.com>
> > > > > > To: Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com
> > > > > > Date: 03/28/2012 03:52 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Optimizer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- select --+ORDERED
> > > > > > select
> > > > > > a18.mdse_grp_key mdse_grp_key,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a12.fiscal_week_id fiscal_week_id,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a13.catgy_manager_key catgy_manager_key,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (sum(a11.total_sales_amt) * 0.001) WJXBFS1,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sum(a11.ext_profit_amt) WJXBFS2,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sum(a11.total_sales_amt) WJXBFS3,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sum(a11.ext_profit_amt) WJXBFS4
> > > > > > from
> > > > > >
> > > > > > week_to_year_lkp a12,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > channel a16,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > chain a15,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > line a14,
> > > > > > efin_wk_line_cls a11,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mdse_class_manager a13,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mdse_class a17,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mdse_category a18,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mdse_group a19,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > department a110,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > business_dept a111
> > > > > > where a11.fiscal_week_id = a12.fiscal_wty_id and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a11.mdse_class_key = a13.mdse_class_key and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a11.sales_line_id = a14.sales_line_id and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a14.sales_chain_id = a15.sales_chain_id and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a15.sales_channel_id = a16.sales_channel_id and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a11.mdse_class_key = a17.mdse_class_key and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a17.mdse_catgy_key = a18.mdse_catgy_key and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a18.mdse_grp_key = a19.mdse_grp_key and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a19.dept_key = a110.dept_key and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a110.bus_dept_key = a111.bus_dept_key
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and (a16.enterprise_id in (18)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and a13.catgy_manager_key in (70)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and a110.dept_grp_key not in (525, 9)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and a14.format_type_id in ('SUPERMKT ')
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and a12.fiscal_week_id in (201253)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > and a111.dept_grp_type_key in (1))
> > > > > > group by a18.mdse_grp_key,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a12.fiscal_week_id,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a13.catgy_manager_key
> > > > > > into temp ZZMD03 with no log
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > forum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Fernando Nunes
> > > > > Portugal
> > > > >
> > > > > http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
> > > > > My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
> > > > >
> > > > > --0023544710d08e6fef04bc540bf4
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> forum.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> forum.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Fernando Nunes
> > > > Portugal
> > > >
> > > > http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
> > > > My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
> > > >
> > > > --20cf3074d934d0d33704bc6205a4
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --e89a8f3ba75f130a3204bc62783a
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > >
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --14dae93406612b710604bc62e2a6
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> >
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --90e6ba6e8f247d81ca04bc639641
>
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

>
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>

--e89a8f3ba503bf128404bc64669d

*******************************************************************************

Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.

Messages In This Thread

  • Fw: Optimizer
    Peter_Logan@spartanstores.com -- Wednesday, 28 March 2012, at 3:59 p.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.